A Bet between Farrar and I

One day we were watching a show called Junkyard Empire and saw that they bet ever so often on things (like if they can restore a vehicle and sell it a certain price). So Farrar had made a comment on how we should see who can get the most cars in.

We both agreed on to see who gets to 100 cars first and the first person to get to 100 cars would get $1,000 out of the other. We both have the same price range $100 if incomplete (no engine or transmission basically nothing) and $200 if complete (all parts or almost all). We both service the same area and we have to pay towing out of pocket (due to not having a tow truck).

I currently have 3 Vehicles. I take the vehicles and post them on Facebook for parts and take them off as I need to or the person comes in by themselves and take it off.

1. Jeep Cherokee Sport 2001 - Auto. 4wd L6 Bad engine.




2. Ford Expedition 2005 - Auto. 4wd bad engine



3.Chevy Blazer 2000- Bad Engine


Farrar Has 1. He uses them as just scrap weight.
1.Saturn Ion 2005- Bad engine and bad body.


There are many more to come in, as I will update when a new hand full of cars come in.

Originally Posted by scrapbabe97

One day we were watching a show called Junkyard Empire and saw that they bet ever so often on things (like if they can restore a vehicle and sell it a certain price). So Farrar had made a comment on how we should see who can get the most cars in.

We both agreed on to see who gets to 100 cars first and the first person to get to 100 cars would get $1,000 out of the other. We both have the same price range $100 if incomplete (no engine or transmission basically nothing) and $200 if complete (all parts or almost all). We both service the same area and we have to pay towing out of pocket (due to not having a tow truck).

I currently have 3 Vehicles. I take the vehicles and post them on Facebook for parts and take them off as I need to or the person comes in by themselves and take it off.

1. Jeep Cherokee Sport 2001 - Auto. 4wd L6 Bad engine.




2. Ford Expedition 2005 - Auto. 4wd bad engine



3.Chevy Blazer 2000- Bad Engine


Farrar Has 1. He uses them as just scrap weight.
1.Saturn Ion 2005- Bad engine and bad body.


There are many more to come in, as I will update when a new hand full of cars come in.

Just scrapped a 2001 expedition that had a good engine. You could have bought that and put it in the one you have. Got $450 for it and still have the cats, pre-cats, aluminum rims and 4 good tires to sell.

just wondering how much are you paying for a wrecker to drop off the cars to you? how do you take your scrap in?

what's up with the body on the ion? looks like spray can flat black? or is it plastic dipped?

looks like you got a decent few cars that have desirable parts

Originally Posted by farrarrecycling

As for towing that varies from $75 to $225 depending on distance. We service all the way down to Machias Maine and all the way up to Houlton Maine area. I have several more cars coming in at the end of week on top of these. But the average towing bill is around $100 each. As for scrap most of it comes in inside the cars or I get it from site clean ups for Free and haul it in either by borrowing a friends truck or using the car or if my cousin has his car carrier at the job site he also hauls for me.

The ION was painted flat black but was spray painted tonight purple, white, and a few other colors due to so much rust nothing outside or underneath could be saved. Most of the cars had a good amount of parts available excluding one and the jeep and blazer have had alot of attention. The Ford Expedition wasnt listed on craigslist or Facebook groups yet but will be soon as I get it drained and the converters removed. The front tires on it are brand new and the back are in excellent shape with a almost new full size spare as well.

All the vehicles pictured plus the ones coming in soon will be crushed by AIM Recycling from Bangor Maine in a few weeks. They drain the vehicles for us and remove any converters we couldnt get when they arrived and haul them to saint john in Canada for shredding.

I was just wondering about trailers and such.... just doing the math... If it was possible to have a truck'/ trailer to haul some of these cars.... Cause I'm figuring that if you both are shooting for 100 cars a piece even at $75 delivered for 100 cars you are at about $7500... thus $4500 for your truck/trailer and 3000 for gas (and could go up from there) & just figure if you are multiplying it to 200 that's at a 9000 truck/trailer and 6000 for gas... roughly... also how do you get them to the yard to get paid....

What makes this worth while for you? verses having your own truck may I ask?

Also IDK how much time you have or that.... but I know 1st hand on the weight of the Saturn plastic, would it be worth your time pulling the body panels and setting on it to sell to some one that needs a fender or that to paint (This is what I have now.... panels upon panels of parts Saturns... thus my name)

In your state, how many licenses do you need to start?
Down here in PA, the legal end of the business is a nightmare!

Can't speak to the licenses, but our motor vehicle inspection program is just awful. Causing problems like you wouldn't believe. It's too much to go into here, but i think i spent close to two years reaching out to the different branches of state government. I detailed everything out so that they could understand. At the end of the day, i believe everyone could see that the program has grown out of control but they couldn't agree on a solution. Nothing got done.

The solution was always simple ..... Grow a pair, make the hard choice, take the heat from those who believe that more state regulation is always a good thing.

It may be even worse when you piss of the working class folks. Here in Maine they elected a very conservative man to the Governor's office as a counterbalance to 40 years of *ahem* progressive growth from the legislature. Now there are a lot of very unhappy people on both sides of the aisle.

That pattern may repeat itself on a larger scale next fall.

The thing with the inspection system is that it's a complicated situation. The basic idea of a yearly inspection is a good one. The problem is that there were more than a few lawsuits brought against the state because their inspection program wasn't comprehensive enough.

You know how it goes .... Someone that may be lacking in common sense hops into a car that really isn't fit to drive. There is a mechanical failure, they perish in the crash, and their family files a wrongful death lawsuit against the state. The family wins, the payout is in the millions, and they have to tighten up the inspection regulations to cover anything and everything that could ever possibly go wrong.

The inspection mechanics are freaked because their first violation is a fine of about two weeks take home pay. A second violation can earn them some time in prison. Now they're reluctant to put a sticker on a vehicle that's over ten years old. What they do is come up with a long list of violations and explain that it will cost far more than the car is worth to fix it.

So .... the poor schmuck that's barely making ends meet has to go take out a bank loan to buy an 8,000 dollar used car that will pass for a sticker so he can get back and forth to work every morning. Now he can't pay for the health insurance that the law requires him to buy so he ends with a debt to the IRS and they slam him with interest & penalties.

Sheesh .... what a cluster**** !

(Sorry for the rant.)

This kinda gets my goat ?

I feel for you guys in heavily regulated states. SD used to have annual inspections when I first started driving but in Wild Bill Janklow's 1st term back around 1980, he got the legislature to do away with it and people of the state have never looked back. I don't know what it takes to buy junked vehicles, the state certainly wants a cut out of any economic activity, but I'm sure its not too crazy unless some sort of special interest deal has been made and no one really saw it or cared about it. South Dakota has a messed up honey bee hive locating law. It doesn't matter if you have hives there now but if you've had hives at a specific location at any time during (not sure of the years but its a long time), you get to control the bee "air space" in a 2 mile radius in any direction. If the state finds you guilty of such a violation, they can make you forfeit your honey. So the big guys (and there is a little honey cartel in the state) move their hives around a lot and control large swaths of the state for their own honey production. Personally, I think it would be a great Supreme Court test to see get done, don't know if its ever been challenged in our state supreme court...

OK, I stand corrected a bit. If you own the land and want to put hives on it, no one else can stop you. But if another party wants to place hives on your property and you want to make a little coin or honey by charging rent, then you may be in violation if someone else has had hives in the area.

Beekeeping Apiary Resources | South Dakota Department of Agriculture

Ummm .... i dunno .... this is a little sketchy. This is just my point of view:

There are many different kinds of government. My best understanding is that we have a (representative)democracy. The people vote and choose someone to speak for them in the legislature. It's the legislature's job to write laws and steer public policy.

Next ... we have the executive branch of government. It's their job to put those laws & policies into effect.

This is where it gets to be a problem. You get different departments or "bureaus" within the executive branch. They propagate regulations on beekeeping or the specifications for a motor vehicle inspection or any of a host of other things. The regulations they write carry the force of law. If you break their rules you get a fine or go to jail.

This is where it gets kinda narfed up. The executive branch doesn't have the authority to make law. That's a different form of government called bureaucracy. There's absolutely nothing wrong with a well run bureaucracy but as far as i know that form of government isn't allowed under the constitution.

At the very least, the legislature should be given the opportunity to vote on any proposed regulation changes before they go into law. It may be that this is being done in every single case of new law going into effect but i doubt it. The executive branch may be overstepping it's bounds.

If you've ever served, or taken the oath "to support & defend", this is what it was all about.