That's one of the things I was referring to.
PayPal is a unique thing, but I'd wager that over 95% of
eBay transactions use it. Easily. For something that's basically the exclusive payment processor for eBay, it should be in the company's "Umbrella".
Chevrolet and Buick are both within GM. They're separate, but share parts. By splitting it off, if PayPal were to fail, eBay itself would be in a bind. I think PayPal will continue to succeed, and if anything, grow. PayPal was already accepting non-eBay payments, though. By keeping them in the family, eBay could easily give a "blood transfusion" to PayPal if needed. As Oldsmobile struggled, GM could prop it up.
I think it's a risky move. If it succeeds, PayPal will clearly be the dominant payment processor. If it fails though, eBay will almost have to open the doors to a competitor, like Google Wallet.
For sellers, I think it's worse. You won't be able to make a return claim with eBay, but you will with PayPal? This is one key reason why they need to be wed at the hip. You're up to the mercy of the seller, then. Or, you can do what they will, and always side with the buyer. Then, people will get to send the item back for a refund, but they won't be able to leave feedback?
Does anyone win (Other than eBay/PayPal)?
Bookmarks