Originally Posted by
alloy2
After watching your videos it's apparent your more of a sculpture than a metal caster.
I've noticed several things your doing wrong, the pattern is usually fixed to a board which is indexed to the cope and drag, the pattern board is placed on the work bench, the drag placed over then filled with sand. The drag is then turned over.
You don't just reach in with your fingers to remove the pattern, should have threaded holes that you can screw a rod into, you gently tap on the rod to loosen the pattern before removing.
With petro bond why are you using two pour holes, one is all that is needed, if your pattern is not filling you need to extend the height of your cope. The added weight of the molten metal in the extended sprue will fill the mold cavity.
The extended sprue serves another purpose, as the metal in the mold cavity cools it shrinks, the extra molten metal in the extended sprue will feed the shrinkage.
I've mentioned this on your tube comments but you seem to thrive in repeating your mistakes.
A comment like that definitely requires a little more clarification from your side. If I get the results I was expecting, how is that a mistake? A more efficient process available? Definitely! The only one that hasn't worked so far is the cup - and I havn't had a chance to retry this with the advice give to me from different sources. My advice from three small casting companies is that the cup walls are too thin to cast with aluminium, which I will challenge using some of the suggestions provided. So let's explore this a little more.
-For the cope and drag being flipped over, how do you do that with a odd shape like this one? If I would have done it the flat 2 part master way, then the end piece on the pommel would have been buried, or the rounded handle part would have been recessed (I tried this method first, and it did not work with this shape). So seeing the result of the second casting that was identical to the first (and my previous rail road spike castings using this method)- what was the mistake I repeated? Was it just that this method is not as efficient as another?
-I do agree that pulling a shape out without touching the sand is the best theoretical approach. How would you have pulled this particular shape out without damaging the finish of the face? What how did my approach on this particular piece removal adversely affect the finished product? I do have some dirty edges to clean up normally - does pulling pieces out with a method like this generally help with cleaner edges?
-For the second sprue, you have mentioned filling both at the same time to reduce material shrinkage affecting the final casting. Smelko, who sold me the petrobond, recommended an entry and exit hole when casting. Chance for heightened efficiency? I'm all ears. Having said that, the half inch holes I use for aluminium doesn't seem to be able to let enough air out and has caused a few air locks and failed castings without a second hole. Adversely, anything copper based (with more mass) has no problem at all. My cope is already at six inches, so if I open up the hole to 3/4" instead of 1/2" maybe it'll give the results with a single hole? Single hole casts i've been seeing in videos are done vertically - do they work as well horizontally?
I just poured the final hilt over the steel frame. After hardening the blade, I didn't want to heat it and anneal it, so the blade was relatively cold. I put three fill holes since I was worried the molten aluminium bronze would solidify before it finished the form. Would a single sprue hole work with a horizontal pour like this? i didn't want to test it out with this and risk ruining the entire project.
Bring up some more details or comments, let's talk about it, and see if the next casting project will work out more like a caster made it than a sculptor.
Bookmarks