Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 25 of 25

The $8,945.00 fine - Page 2

| Off Topic Discussions
  1. #21
    Fubar701's Avatar
    SMF Badges of Honor


    Member since
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ellsworth Maine
    Posts
    78
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 62 Times in 31 Posts
    Ahh ok, general law any two axle must not weight more than 34000 lbs, vehicle weight and payload combimed


  2. The Following 2 Users say Thank You for This Post by Fubar701:



  3. #22
    armygreywolf's Avatar
    SMF Badges of Honor



    Member since
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Germantown, WI
    Posts
    1,084
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 2,064 Times in 649 Posts
    OK, so this guy was something like 10,800lbs overweight....BUT the DOT system of measurement in SD is a little strange.

    Basically it states the maximum axle weight is the width of the tread in total on each axle times 500lbs... Someone should really give them a lesson in physics since you can in fact have a skinny tire AND have a larger footprint. Example: Supersingles are very wide, but running 110 psi vs duals running 95 psi, the duals will have a larger footprint. Why? Well, it's simple, the tire's carcass weight plus the pounds per square inch is the actual footprint of the tire on the road surface.

    let's use my dodge. 6,000 lbs with me in it. I run my tires at 42psi, conincidentally the tire weighs 42 lbs. Static tire psi on the ground would be close to 43psi...thus a tire off the truck with nothing but the tire and rim combination would have slightly more than 1.5 square inches of complete tread contact with the road soooo.... a 6000lb truck, divided by four tires, divided again by the the air pressure of the tire would equal the contact patch on the ground... aka

    35.7 square inches of surface per tire.

    http://www.sddot.com/resources/Broch...riefing_2d.pdf <<<thats my source for the SD DOT information.

    Anyways...it's a ****ty way for them to tag you with a fine on a smaller truck, just my opinion. In fact, cut me a ticket like that and I'm going to make your whole state look like morons for coming up with this stupendous failure of math. Imagine if your running a Single axle grain truck on 9.50- tires...those older trucks are rated for SERIOUS weight, always have been...but according to DOT math, a few mattresses would put you over weight.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to armygreywolf for This Post:


  5. #23
    matador's Avatar
    SMF Badges of Honor

    We purchase laptop computers and many components for greater than scrap value. We offer a shipping reimbursement program.replies

    Member since
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Big Wonderful Wyoming
    Posts
    2,310
    Thanks
    1,813
    Thanked 3,200 Times in 1,448 Posts
    That must have been very overweight.

    Now, it says that it was overweight on an axle. Do we know if it's a semi axle? I've seen farmers go overboard on loading goosenecks, too.

    Who knows what happened. I feel bad if he was a farm driver who worked where there was no scale to weigh on nearby. If he worked for a freight company, though, he should have reasonable access to a scale somewhere.

    I was overweight by about 100 pounds on a truck once, but this had to be very overloaded to cause an $8900 fine. Or there was something else wrong, too???

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to matador for This Post:


  7. #24
    armygreywolf's Avatar
    SMF Badges of Honor



    Member since
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Germantown, WI
    Posts
    1,084
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 2,064 Times in 649 Posts
    That's what I mean...according to the archaic "maths" running 9.50 highway tires on any 10k/axle gooseneck would have you grossly overweight in a hurry. Lot's of guys I know in hotshotting run triple axle, single wheel goosenecks and fifth wheels for the best mileage. Do the math on a skinny tire and your talking some rediculous fines for hauling a couple generators around....and that'd be essentially in the 40k range with a gmc topkick or ihi 4700... Not suggesting the guy wasn't wrong just that if it was me...you could kiss my grits if you thought I'd pay a fine based on archaic math, especially if I wasn't over the manufacturer's axle rating.

    My understanding is rating is supposed to be like this> interstate 80k/105k for double/triple trailer/truck axles. No more than axle or combined tire gross weight rating, whichever is lower...on any given axle...THEN levied fine for taking your truck down a secondary road with bridges and such not rated for your gross tonnage. A measurement of tread width times an arbitrary number do NOTHING...heck, some guys are running skinnies to save fuel right now anyways.
    Last edited by armygreywolf; 09-19-2014 at 02:21 PM.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to armygreywolf for This Post:


  9. #25
    pjost started this thread.
    pjost's Avatar
    SMF Badges of Honor

    Member since
    Apr 2014
    Location
    N & South Dakota
    Posts
    994
    Thanks
    5,151
    Thanked 2,258 Times in 682 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by armygreywolf View Post
    That's what I mean...according to the archaic "maths" running 9.50 highway tires on any 10k/axle gooseneck would have you grossly overweight in a hurry. Lot's of guys I know in hotshotting run triple axle, single wheel goosenecks and fifth wheels for the best mileage. Do the math on a skinny tire and your talking some rediculous fines for hauling a couple generators around....and that'd be essentially in the 40k range with a gmc topkick or ihi 4700... Not suggesting the guy wasn't wrong just that if it was me...you could kiss my grits if you thought I'd pay a fine based on archaic math, especially if I wasn't over the manufacturer's axle rating.

    My understanding is rating is supposed to be like this> interstate 80k/105k for double/triple trailer/truck axles. No more than axle or combined tire gross weight rating, whichever is lower...on any given axle...THEN levied fine for taking your truck down a secondary road with bridges and such not rated for your gross tonnage. A measurement of tread width times an arbitrary number do NOTHING...heck, some guys are running skinnies to save fuel right now anyways.
    You lost me at "That's..."
    Money is not the root of all evil, the love of money is.

  10. The Following 2 Users say Thank You for This Post by pjost:



  11. Similar threads on the Scrap Metal Forum

    1. Two questions on this fine, bright, crisp morning...
      By thebugguy in forum A Day in the Life of a Scrapper
      Replies: 12
      Last Post: 03-14-2014, 12:38 PM
    2. A fine candidate for a Darwin Award...
      By BohemianLush in forum Scrap Metal Spots
      Replies: 6
      Last Post: 05-11-2013, 06:53 PM
    3. great craigslist fine!!!!
      By machinistace802 in forum A Day in the Life of a Scrapper
      Replies: 21
      Last Post: 08-13-2012, 11:15 AM
    4. Nice! Thanks to all you fine folks @ SMF !
      By Bear in forum Off Topic Discussions
      Replies: 8
      Last Post: 04-17-2012, 10:44 AM
    5. % of cu content in fine computer wire ?
      By EcoSafe in forum General Electronics Recycling
      Replies: 12
      Last Post: 12-27-2011, 11:33 PM

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)

 
Browse the Most Recent Threads
On SMF In THIS CATEGORY.





OR

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

The Scrap Metal Forum

    The Scrap Metal Forum is the #1 scrap metal recycling community in the world. Here we talk about the scrap metal business, making money, where we connect with other scrappers, scrap yards and more.

SMF on Facebook and Twitter

Twitter Facebook