Let me rephrase: I had made an assumption that you planned to manufacture or source a manufacturing house...which led me to believe you wanted to engineer it for maximum product life over lowest cost to manufacture. Correct me on that if I am wrong here.
My concerns and yours are probably the same, I was using the effectively generated force as a reference, the same as you would from light versus heavy pressure on a piece of sandpaper. These are probably out of the scope of the product, things like coating and certain kinds of plastics. That is found more in specialty manufacturing where precision and longevity are the main factors. Still, I'd appreciate a little less condescension, you may google it, I studied it and earned a degree. I was honestly trying to tell you that a consultation by a firm might save you thousands (or hand over a foot here...) possibly improve your product over it's predecessor. I know how these things work, wouldnt be nice to increase material processing rates without increasing machine size...or cost. More clients, more effective word of mouth in an industry that's alot like forestry, guys get set on using a particular process, manufacturer etc. Just my idle banter on that subject, was trying to help.
((Got a PM explaining who you were, I never saw alloy2 before so made the assumption he was a newer guy and wanted to ensure the forum was getting it's due service. My apologies))
Bookmarks