Originally Posted by
t00nces2
Now, a question for all here who criticized me for being unethical instead of offering an opinion on the question: Do you sell your scrap to the yard that offers the cheapest price or do you shop around to find the yard that pays the best? Are you being unethical? Using your logic, why shouldn't you offer to gift your scrap to the handicapped woman with the car full of children and pets instead of choosing the young Mercedes driver that can afford to pay more? What is the difference?
Your example is a massive stretch. There are lots of differences. You are not a gas station. Instead you're suggesting opportunism and avarice based upon impending catastrophe. That isn't the same as shopping around. If you can't see the difference I don't know what to tell you.
Many of us, I'm sure, do help out other folks where we can. But your example doesn't take into account that many of us depend in part or completely on scrap for our income. To give away all our income is simply to switch places. Your comparison in practice offers martyrdom as the 'good' option. You do not depend on gasoline sales for your income and you will not be martyred for want of exploiting people who have zero options. If you can't see the difference I don't know what to tell you.
Your plan is premised on specifically exploiting people under duress. A more apt comparison would be if the disabled woman from your example (let's pretend a mobility disability) had her chair's motor die. And you had a spare motor. But because she desperately needed it and didn't have other options you, instead of selling it for a normal price to her, you sought out a wealthy disabled person who wouldn't blink at an unjustifiably extravagant price. If you can't see the difference I don't know what to tell you.
Bookmarks